Likes Likes:  0
Resultaten 1 tot 3 van de 3
Geen

Onderwerp: New Data Wipe Tools

  1. #1
    Thomas C. Greene
    New Data Wipe Tools
    Gast
    n/a Berichten
    Berichten zijn liked



    Thread Starter

    New Data Wipe Tools

    I've created a few simple shell scripts that use /dev/urandom to wipe data
    from the swap partition, wipe unused disk space on the root partition, or
    wipe an entire disk. You'll find them at http://basicsec.org/tools.html.

    Data hygiene is generally easier on *nix because there are fewer hiding places
    than on a Windows system, but there are no free wipe tools that i'm aware of.
    So I got busy.

    This is not a perfect solution, but it's a step. I'd be delighted to knows
    from fellow list members what I might do to improve them. The scripts are
    freely available and freely modifyable (is "modifyable" a legitimate word?)

    PS: See the README file for cautions, exceptions, and caveats.

    thanks,
    --tcg

    ===============
    Thomas C. Greene
    Associate Editor
    The Register
    http://www.theregister.co.uk
    http://basicsec.org




  2. #2
    Derek Martin
    New Data Wipe Tools
    Gast
    n/a Berichten
    Berichten zijn liked



    Thread Starter

    Re: New Data Wipe Tools


    --IS0zKkzwUGydFO0o
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
    Content-Disposition: inline

    On Fri, Sep 10, 2004 at 10:17:05AM -0700, Thomas C. Greene wrote:
    > Data hygiene is generally easier on *nix because there are fewer hiding
    > places than on a Windows system, but there are no free wipe tools that i'm
    > aware of. So I got busy.


    Well, there's GNU shred, which is part of the GNU coreutils package...
    And there are at least a few others:

    http://freshmeat.net/search/?q=secur...&Go.x=0&Go.y=0
    http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&l...ux&btnG=Search

    I have not used any of these tools, and do not endorse any of them.

    --
    Derek D. Martin
    http://www.pizzashack.org/
    GPG Key ID: 0x81CFE75D


    --IS0zKkzwUGydFO0o
    Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
    Content-Disposition: inline

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
    Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

    iD8DBQFBQ9ccdjdlQoHP510RAqjIAJ4nt/SY/xEbDwhGeNybZjbAaXNGiwCghdBq
    Icjc7BMl5AQQo9fCISGiyfk=
    =wo/4
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

    --IS0zKkzwUGydFO0o--

  3. #3
    Altheide, Cory B.
    New Data Wipe Tools
    Gast
    n/a Berichten
    Berichten zijn liked



    Thread Starter

    RE: New Data Wipe Tools

    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: Jake Appelbaum [mailto:jacob@appelbaum.net]
    > Sent: Friday, September 10, 2004 10:42 AM
    > To: Thomas C. Greene; bugtraq@securityfocus.com
    > Subject: Re: New Data Wipe Tools
    >
    > Magnetic force microscopy is a threat that is very real for
    > many people.
    >
    > It would be of great help for you to read this paper:
    > http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~pgut00...ecure_del.html
    >


    Yes, and pay special attention to this portion:

    "Epilogue

    In the time since this paper was published, some people have treated the
    35-pass overwrite technique described in it more as a kind of voodoo
    incantation to banish evil spirits than the result of a technical analysis
    of drive encoding techniques. As a result, they advocate applying the voodoo
    to PRML and EPRML drives even though it will have no more effect than a
    simple scrubbing with random data. In fact performing the full 35-pass
    overwrite is pointless for any drive since it targets a blend of scenarios
    involving all types of (normally-used) encoding technology, which covers
    everything back to 30+-year-old MFM methods (if you don't understand that
    statement, re-read the paper). If you're using a drive which uses encoding
    technology X, you only need to perform the passes specific to X, and you
    never need to perform all 35 passes. For any modern PRML/EPRML drive, a few
    passes of random scrubbing is the best you can do. As the paper says, "A
    good scrubbing with random data will do about as well as can be expected".
    This was true in 1996, and is still true now."

    Summary: Gutmann's paper is an academic snapshot that was valid for a short
    period of time 8 years ago. While an excellent read, it is no longer
    relevant with modern fixed-disk storage. Wipe once and you've jumped
    *extremely* far up the data recovery Bell curve. Once you're dealing with
    near-mythical advesaries who have the capability (budget + skill + desire)
    to recover overwritten data, you're better off disappearing the meat instead
    of the bits.

    Cory Altheide
    Senior Network Forensics Specialist
    NNSA Information Assurance Response Center (IARC)
    altheidec@nv.doe.gov




Webhostingtalk.nl

Contact

  • Rokin 113-115
  • 1012 KP, Amsterdam
  • Nederland
  • Contact
© Copyright 2001-2026 Webhostingtalk.nl.
Web Statistics