Re: Super News - Blocking people based upon forgeries.
in article MPG.1ae33a225d769105989b59@news.verizon.net, reverend maxwell
snort at user@domain.com wrote on 04/11/2004 9:22 AM:
> threats? no. I don't make idle threats. I'm just relating history.
> if you wish to learn, then let us play.
> if ignorance is bliss, then go away.
Oh, by the way, your threat has been archived.
Just a reminder.
Re: Super News - Blocking people based upon forgeries.
Combaticus <combaticus@combiworld.com> writes:
> in article 2hng70l9cu4ep2fa8laa9ejt8kmagg32ab@4ax.com, Aratzio at
> aratzio@lalalala.com wrote on 04/10/2004 1:56 PM:
>
>
>>> Blah Blah Blah
>>>
>>
>> Wow so insightful and intelligent. Is that how you treat your
>> customers...
>
> Your fired as my customer. Now go piss off.
>
> ":^) ®
Yes, that is how he treats his customers.
--
Rebecca Ore
http://mysite.verizon.net/rebecca.ore
Re: Super News - Blocking people based upon forgeries.
On Sun, 11 Apr 2004 18:18:16 GMT, Rebecca Ore
<ogoense.net@verizon.net> wrote:
>Combaticus <combaticus@combiworld.com> writes:
>
>> in article 2hng70l9cu4ep2fa8laa9ejt8kmagg32ab@4ax.com, Aratzio at
>> aratzio@lalalala.com wrote on 04/10/2004 1:56 PM:
>>
>>
>>>> Blah Blah Blah
>>>>
>>>
>>> Wow so insightful and intelligent. Is that how you treat your
>>> customers...
>>
>> Your fired as my customer. Now go piss off.
>>
>> ":^) ®
>
>Yes, that is how he treats his customers.
And what's best about that is he leaves a record for his customers to
find. Really bright, but not to many bright spammers out there or they
would not need spam to promote themselves.
'Ratz
Re: Super News - Blocking people based upon forgeries.
in article m3d66etm3g.fsf@pyrophore.ogo.invalid, Rebecca Ore at
ogoense.net@verizon.net wrote on 04/11/2004 11:18 AM:
>> Your fired as my customer. Now go piss off.
>>
>> ":^) ®
>
> Yes, that is how he treats his customers.
If you don't like it, too bad.
Re: Super News - Blocking people based upon forgeries.
in article kl3j705sdrahfbktb3i75vsh4t1bklkje5@4ax.com, Aratzio at
aratzio@lalalala.com wrote on 04/11/2004 11:31 AM:
> And what's best about that is he leaves a record for his customers to
> find. Really bright...
My clients by my time and my talent, I am not selling my opinions about News
Providers to clients.
My opinions about news providers are not for sale. I will not limit my
writing in newsgroups so that some fantasy client will "like me". I am
willing to pay the price of lost business to clients that have thin skin and
can't take an opinion that might offended them.
I don't need or want such clients.
Clear enough for you?
":^) ®
Re: Super News - Blocking people based upon forgeries.
On Sun, 11 Apr 2004 12:44:17 -0700, "Mike..." <mike@artistmike.com>
wrote:
>in article kl3j705sdrahfbktb3i75vsh4t1bklkje5@4ax.com, Aratzio at
>aratzio@lalalala.com wrote on 04/11/2004 11:31 AM:
>> And what's best about that is he leaves a record for his customers to
>> find. Really bright...
>
>My clients by my time and my talent, I am not selling my opinions about News
>Providers to clients.
>
>My opinions about news providers are not for sale. I will not limit my
>writing in newsgroups so that some fantasy client will "like me". I am
>willing to pay the price of lost business to clients that have thin skin and
>can't take an opinion that might offended them.
You can express any opinion you like. It's your decision to act like
an irrational, unprofessional, immature fuckhead while doing so that
would bother anyone considering being a customer of yours.
Re: Super News - Blocking people based upon forgeries.
Good for you Mike. Anyone with any self respect has booted a coustomer out
the door for not mesuring up.
LP
"AlwaysCorrect" <AlwaysCorrect@AC.com> wrote in message
news:BC9EEC93.F329A%AlwaysCorrect@AC.com...
> in article m3d66etm3g.fsf@pyrophore.ogo.invalid, Rebecca Ore at
> ogoense.net@verizon.net wrote on 04/11/2004 11:18 AM:
>
>
> >> Your fired as my customer. Now go piss off.
> >>
> >> ":^) ®
> >
> > Yes, that is how he treats his customers.
>
>
> If you don't like it, too bad.
>
>
>
Re: Super News - Blocking people based upon forgeries.
In article <kl3j705sdrahfbktb3i75vsh4t1bklkje5@4ax.com>,=20
aratzio@lalalala.com says...
> On Sun, 11 Apr 2004 18:18:16 GMT, Rebecca Ore
> <ogoense.net@verizon.net> wrote:
>=20
> >Combaticus <combaticus@combiworld.com> writes:
> >
> >> in article 2hng70l9cu4ep2fa8laa9ejt8kmagg32ab@4ax.com, Aratzio at
> >> aratzio@lalalala.com wrote on 04/10/2004 1:56 PM:
> >>
> >>
> >>>> Blah Blah Blah=20
> >>>>=20
> >>>=20
> >>> Wow so insightful and intelligent. Is that how you treat your
> >>> customers...
> >>
> >> Your fired as my customer. Now go piss off.
> >>
> >> ":^) =AE
> >
> >Yes, that is how he treats his customers.
>=20
> And what's best about that is he leaves a record for his customers to
> find. Really bright, but not to many bright spammers out there or they
> would not need spam to promote themselves.
the big question does he really have customers, or are his socks just=20
buying stuff from him. I mean, that's how he posts; it stand to=20
reason...
Re: Super News - Blocking people based upon forgeries.
In article <BC9EC3E7.F321A%dyarnall@chump.net>, dyarnall@chump.net
says...
> in article MPG.1ae33a225d769105989b59@news.verizon.net, reverend maxwell
> snort at user@domain.com wrote on 04/11/2004 9:22 AM:
>
> > threats? no. I don't make idle threats. I'm just relating history.
> > if you wish to learn, then let us play.
> > if ignorance is bliss, then go away.
>
> Oh, by the way, your threat has been archived.
>
> Just a reminder.
I've had "threats" I've made archived for years. this doesn't worry me.
it should tell you quite a bit about me, however. ready to play?
c'mon; say the word. you're chicken, aren't you?
Re: Super News - Blocking people based upon forgeries.
In article <BC9EC3AB.F3219%dyarnall@chump.net>, dyarnall@chump.net
says...
> in article MPG.1ae33a225d769105989b59@news.verizon.net, reverend maxwell
> snort at user@domain.com wrote on 04/11/2004 9:22 AM:
>
> > threats? no. I don't make idle threats. I'm just relating history.
> > if you wish to learn, then let us play.
> > if ignorance is bliss, then go away.
>
> My guess is that you will have to do much better if you are going to get him
> to "go away".
//note to self: add "dave" to list of socks//
I don't *want you to go away. I *want you to play a game with me.
c'mon; anyone with the balls to SPAM USENET isn't afraid of a game.
Re: Super News - Blocking people based upon forgeries.
in article 3aed19ebbbe766c22e30228c1623dc92@news.teranews.com, Seth at
me@privacy.net wrote on 04/11/2004 2:16 PM:
> On Sun, 11 Apr 2004 12:44:17 -0700, "Mike..." <mike@artistmike.com>
> wrote:
>> in article kl3j705sdrahfbktb3i75vsh4t1bklkje5@4ax.com, Aratzio at
>> aratzio@lalalala.com wrote on 04/11/2004 11:31 AM:
>>> And what's best about that is he leaves a record for his customers to
>>> find. Really bright...
>>
>> My clients by my time and my talent, I am not selling my opinions about News
>> Providers to clients.
>>
>> My opinions about news providers are not for sale. I will not limit my
>> writing in newsgroups so that some fantasy client will "like me". I am
>> willing to pay the price of lost business to clients that have thin skin and
>> can't take an opinion that might offended them.
>
> You can express any opinion you like. It's your decision...
Yes it is... and there is nothing you can do about it except cry and moan.
So let's read another message about how you are bothered by what other
people choose to do in newsgroups.
hahahaha.
Re: Super News - Blocking people based upon forgeries.
in article MPG.1ae367edf34b41c8989b6d@news.verizon.net, reverend maxwell
snort at user@domain.com wrote on 04/11/2004 3:22 PM:
> In article <BC9EC3E7.F321A%dyarnall@chump.net>, dyarnall@chump.net
> says...
>> in article MPG.1ae33a225d769105989b59@news.verizon.net, reverend maxwell
>> snort at user@domain.com wrote on 04/11/2004 9:22 AM:
>>
>>> threats? no. I don't make idle threats. I'm just relating history.
>>> if you wish to learn, then let us play.
>>> if ignorance is bliss, then go away.
>>
>> Oh, by the way, your threat has been archived.
>>
>> Just a reminder.
>
> I've had "threats" I've made archived for years. this doesn't worry me.
> it should tell you quite a bit about me, however. ready to play?
> c'mon; say the word. you're chicken, aren't you?
"Chicken" of what?
You don't need permission to "play" your little game, do you?
hahahaha.
Re: Super News - Blocking people based upon forgeries.
in article MPG.1ae3688a7df3a578989b6e@news.verizon.net, reverend maxwell
snort at user@domain.com wrote on 04/11/2004 3:22 PM:
> In article <BC9EC3AB.F3219%dyarnall@chump.net>, dyarnall@chump.net
> says...
>> in article MPG.1ae33a225d769105989b59@news.verizon.net, reverend maxwell
>> snort at user@domain.com wrote on 04/11/2004 9:22 AM:
>>
>>> threats? no. I don't make idle threats. I'm just relating history.
>>> if you wish to learn, then let us play.
>>> if ignorance is bliss, then go away.
>>
>> My guess is that you will have to do much better if you are going to get him
>> to "go away".
>
> //note to self: add "dave" to list of socks//
>
> I don't *want I *want...
What you want is irrelevant.
Re: Super News - Blocking people based upon forgeries.
On Sun, 11 Apr 2004 17:15:41 -0700, AlwaysCorrect
<AlwaysCorrect@AC.com> wrote:
>in article 3aed19ebbbe766c22e30228c1623dc92@news.teranews.com, Seth at
>me@privacy.net wrote on 04/11/2004 2:16 PM:
>
>> On Sun, 11 Apr 2004 12:44:17 -0700, "Mike..." <mike@artistmike.com>
>> wrote:
>>> in article kl3j705sdrahfbktb3i75vsh4t1bklkje5@4ax.com, Aratzio at
>>> aratzio@lalalala.com wrote on 04/11/2004 11:31 AM:
>>>> And what's best about that is he leaves a record for his customers to
>>>> find. Really bright...
>>>
>>> My clients by my time and my talent, I am not selling my opinions about News
>>> Providers to clients.
>>>
>>> My opinions about news providers are not for sale. I will not limit my
>>> writing in newsgroups so that some fantasy client will "like me". I am
>>> willing to pay the price of lost business to clients that have thin skin and
>>> can't take an opinion that might offended them.
>>
>> You can express any opinion you like. It's your decision...
>
>Yes it is... and there is nothing you can do about it except cry and moan.
I think you're doing more than enough for everyone, Mike.
>So let's read another message about how you are bothered by what other
>people choose to do in newsgroups.
It doesn't bother me, even the relatively few posts I have read,
although all these whining posts by you are obviously annoying, in a
similar way to why dogshit is annoying on a public park.
However, I'm sure it would bother me if I was a customer of yours and
realised how irrational and unprofessional you are.
Re: Super News - Blocking people based upon forgeries.
in article 25b3233ac0d8fcf6cb2ce426aca4cf3a@news.teranews.com, Seth at
me@privacy.net wrote on 04/11/2004 6:44 PM:
> However, I'm sure it would bother me if I was a customer of yours and
> realised how irrational and unprofessional you are.
>
Blah Blah Blah