Re: Super News - Blocking people based upon forgeries.

In article <BC9E00FE.F2DFD%combaticus@combiworld.com>,
combaticus@combiworld.com says...
> in article MPG.1ae2781bc68d9abd989b47@news.verizon.net, reverend maxwell
> snort at user@domain.com wrote on 04/10/2004 7:34 PM:
>
>
> > I don't give a rat's ass who posted them, where are the headers, and
> > legit headers for comparison.
>
>
>
> Do your own work.

my own work; my own rules. you, are a fucking spammer, and a troll.
you will burn in the hell I will make for you, or you will run out
screaming.

shall we play, you arrogant unwit?

In article <0jeh70p4g1mtdvomipjv420o855n7i80br@4ax.com>, J@P.net says...
> On Sat, 10 Apr 2004 20:13:29 -0700, "Mike..." <mike@artistmike.com>
> wrote:
>
> >They post just as many messages as I do in a day... and they have their link
> >in each message. But it is not ok for me to do the same, because they don't
> >like my "attitude" or they don't like the topics that I choose to post
> >about, or they don't like getting crybabies writing to them about my "mean"
> >messages.
> >
> >Tough.
> >
> >They are out of the loop now.
>
> The way you are going, you will soon be out of the loop yourself.

oh, no; I want him in the loop. his own loop. making a tight downward
spiral.

On Sun, 11 Apr 2004 03:45:38 GMT, reverend maxwell snort
<user@domain.com> wrote:

>In article <BC9E00FE.F2DFD%combaticus@combiworld.com>,
>combaticus@combiworld.com says...
>> in article MPG.1ae2781bc68d9abd989b47@news.verizon.net, reverend maxwell
>> snort at user@domain.com wrote on 04/10/2004 7:34 PM:
>>
>>
>> > I don't give a rat's ass who posted them, where are the headers, and
>> > legit headers for comparison.
>>
>>
>>
>> Do your own work.
>
>my own work; my own rules. you, are a fucking spammer, and a troll.
>you will burn in the hell I will make for you, or you will run out
>screaming.
>
>shall we play, you arrogant unwit?

I smell something brewing!

in article 0jeh70p4g1mtdvomipjv420o855n7i80br@4ax.com, J@P.net at J@P.net
wrote on 04/10/2004 8:25 PM:


>
> The way you are going, you will soon be out of the loop yourself.


Is that a problem for you?

in article MPG.1ae288a95ce07e3c989b52@news.verizon.net, reverend maxwell
snort at user@domain.com wrote on 04/10/2004 8:45 PM:


> my own work; my own rules. you, are a fucking spammer, and a troll.
> you will burn in the hell I will make for you, or you will run out
> screaming.
>
> shall we play, you arrogant unwit?

Your silly threats are irrelevant.

I must admit that my spelling and use of the English language is not that
good at the best of times. But did you note how little since the line you
quoted makes Mike?
LP.

"AlwaysCorrect" <AlwaysCorrect@AC.com> wrote in message
news:BC9E18CC.F2E3C%AlwaysCorrect@AC.com...
> in article MPG.1ae288a95ce07e3c989b52@news.verizon.net, reverend maxwell
> snort at user@domain.com wrote on 04/10/2004 8:45 PM:
>
>
> > my own work; my own rules. you, are a fucking spammer, and a troll.
> > you will burn in the hell I will make for you, or you will run out
> > screaming.
> >
> > shall we play, you arrogant unwit?
>
> Your silly threats are irrelevant.
>
>
>

Did anyone note the IP in the message to the "hate group" that was supposed
to be from mike was from Regina Canada? It belongs to Sasktel.net And I live
a lot closer than mike. But then again they are still blocking me for
something that was done by a user trying to be my (or pretend to be me)
while I was in another country. Yes this is right I could have posted stuff
while my computer was not on, and I was 5000 miles from home. Makes sense to
me.
LP.

"Lord Pander" <noway@mailinator.com> wrote in message
news:107hjj1ifbgc141@corp.supernews.com...
> I must admit that my spelling and use of the English language is not that
> good at the best of times. But did you note how little since the line you
> quoted makes Mike?
> LP.
>
> "AlwaysCorrect" <AlwaysCorrect@AC.com> wrote in message
> news:BC9E18CC.F2E3C%AlwaysCorrect@AC.com...
> > in article MPG.1ae288a95ce07e3c989b52@news.verizon.net, reverend maxwell
> > snort at user@domain.com wrote on 04/10/2004 8:45 PM:
> >
> >
> > > my own work; my own rules. you, are a fucking spammer, and a troll.
> > > you will burn in the hell I will make for you, or you will run out
> > > screaming.
> > >
> > > shall we play, you arrogant unwit?
> >
> > Your silly threats are irrelevant.
> >
> >
> >
>
>

On Sat, 10 Apr 2004 21:32:39 -0700, AlwaysCorrect
<AlwaysCorrect@AC.com> wrote:

>in article 0jeh70p4g1mtdvomipjv420o855n7i80br@4ax.com, J@P.net at J@P.net
>wrote on 04/10/2004 8:25 PM:
>
>
>>
>> The way you are going, you will soon be out of the loop yourself.
>
>
>Is that a problem for you?
>
>
Nopers

reverend maxwell snort <user@domain.com> wrote:
> J@P.net says...
>> "Mikey..." <mike@fartistemikey.com> wrote:
>>
>> >They post just as many messages as I do in a day... and they have
>> >their link in each message. But it is not ok for me to do the
>> >same, because they don't like my "attitude" or they don't like the
>> >topics that I choose to post about, or they don't like getting
>> >crybabies writing to them about my "mean" messages.
>> >
>> >Tough.
>> >
>> >They are out of the loop now.
>>
>> The way you are going, you will soon be out of the loop yourself.
>
> oh, no; I want him in the loop. his own loop. making a tight
> downward spiral.

In ever-decreasing circles, before disappearing in a puff of blue smoke.

--
Martin S.

On Sun, 11 Apr 2004 01:18:41 -0400, MartinS <me@my.place> got double
secret probation because:

>reverend maxwell snort <user@domain.com> wrote:
>> J@P.net says...
>>> "Mikey..." <mike@fartistemikey.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> >They post just as many messages as I do in a day... and they have
>>> >their link in each message. But it is not ok for me to do the
>>> >same, because they don't like my "attitude" or they don't like the
>>> >topics that I choose to post about, or they don't like getting
>>> >crybabies writing to them about my "mean" messages.
>>> >
>>> >Tough.
>>> >
>>> >They are out of the loop now.
>>>
>>> The way you are going, you will soon be out of the loop yourself.
>>
>> oh, no; I want him in the loop. his own loop. making a tight
>> downward spiral.
>
>In ever-decreasing circles, before disappearing in a puff of blue smoke.

That or they just take him away in his "special" coat when he thinks
he is a puff of blue smoke.

Cue I Dream Of Jeannie Theme...

'Ratz




--

A Number 1, Grade A, Prime USDA 'Ratz
Accept No Substitute

Mime-version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Lines: 26
Organization: Unlimited download news at news.astraweb.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 81733dfe.news.astraweb.com
X-Trace: DXC=1m5l5LinF?lfMO9kN]`\TcL?0kYOcDh@jSJ_V0ZfNaQl`b[L<feULnjD`Gg;;\dn[dJCEm[h3=?gl_\XKfAgBHKbnQBdZSaFY4d
Xref: nl-news.euro.net nl.internet.providers:147524

in article 7jkh70t995tukvrkhoegdiju5693piqjff@4ax.com, J@P.net at J@P.net
wrote on 04/10/2004 10:06 PM:

> On Sat, 10 Apr 2004 21:32:39 -0700, AlwaysCorrect
> <AlwaysCorrect@AC.com> wrote:
>
>> in article 0jeh70p4g1mtdvomipjv420o855n7i80br@4ax.com, J@P.net at J@P.net
>> wrote on 04/10/2004 8:25 PM:
>>
>>
>>>
>>> The way you are going, you will soon be out of the loop yourself.
>>
>>
>> Is that a problem for you?
>>
>>
> Nopers.

Then you have nothing to whine and cry about. Move on. Supernews is
infested with censors that censor customers based upon whim and lies.

In article <BC9E05E9.F2E0A%mike@artistmike.com>,
"Mike..." <mike@artistmike.com> wrote:


> I paid for the service, I intended to use the service. After the fact they
> make rules up as they go along, "Mike" posts too many messages.
>
> hahahahaha.
>
>
> They post just as many messages as I do in a day... and they have their link
> in each message. But it is not ok for me to do the same, because they don't
> like my "attitude" or they don't like the topics that I choose to post
> about, or they don't like getting crybabies writing to them about my "mean"
> messages.
>
> Tough.
>
> They are out of the loop now.

You sound like a big crybaby.

Do you need some sugar tit?

In article <BC9E18CC.F2E3C%AlwaysCorrect@AC.com>, AlwaysCorrect@AC.com
says...
> in article MPG.1ae288a95ce07e3c989b52@news.verizon.net, reverend maxwell
> snort at user@domain.com wrote on 04/10/2004 8:45 PM:
>
> > my own work; my own rules. you, are a fucking spammer, and a troll.
> > you will burn in the hell I will make for you, or you will run out
> > screaming.
> >
> > shall we play, you arrogant unwit?
>
> Your silly threats are irrelevant.

threats? no. I don't make idle threats. I'm just relating history.
if you wish to learn, then let us play.
if ignorance is bliss, then go away.

In article <BC9E2705.F2E85%aratzie@lalalala.com>, aratzie@lalalala.com
says...
> in article 7jkh70t995tukvrkhoegdiju5693piqjff@4ax.com, J@P.net at J@P.net
> wrote on 04/10/2004 10:06 PM:
>
> > On Sat, 10 Apr 2004 21:32:39 -0700, AlwaysCorrect
> > <AlwaysCorrect@AC.com> wrote:
> >
> >> in article 0jeh70p4g1mtdvomipjv420o855n7i80br@4ax.com, J@P.net at J@P.net
> >> wrote on 04/10/2004 8:25 PM:
> >>
> >>
> >>>
> >>> The way you are going, you will soon be out of the loop yourself.
> >>
> >>
> >> Is that a problem for you?
> >>
> >>
> > Nopers.
>
> Then you have nothing to whine and cry about. Move on. Supernews is
> infested with censors that censor customers based upon whim and lies.

did you see the movie "the princess bride"? remember the part where
inigo montoya says to vezzini "you keep using that word. I do not think
it means what you think it means"?

apply the anaolgy, no-wit

in article MPG.1ae33a225d769105989b59@news.verizon.net, reverend maxwell
snort at user@domain.com wrote on 04/11/2004 9:22 AM:


> threats? no. I don't make idle threats. I'm just relating history.
> if you wish to learn, then let us play.
> if ignorance is bliss, then go away.


My guess is that you will have to do much better if you are going to get him
to "go away".