Likes Likes:  0
Resultaten 1 tot 3 van de 3
Geen
  1. #1
    Paul
    Re: Office 10 applications & flashdrives can be used to browse
    Gast
    n/a Berichten
    Berichten zijn liked



    Thread Starter

    Re: Office 10 applications & flashdrives can be used to browse

    In-Reply-To: <066F402A7185F04E8B7506F582E00E895E4C4C@mcg-ex02.mcgov.org>

    >VENDOR RESPONSE
    >This issue was reported to Microsoft on Feb 11, 2005, acknowledged by
    >support, and as of today our best efforts to get a hotfix (or even a
    >commitment to produce a hotfix at some later date) have been fruitless.


    You believe that Microsoft should release a hotfix for this vulnerability, although a service pack allegedly fixes it. This does not make sense to me and only seems like an attempt by you to bash Microsoft and make yourself look "powerful". Service packs
    are released to fix large quantities of vulnerabilities such as this one and releasing hotfixes for each individual vulnerability fixed by a service pack would require large sums of money and time. Seriously, people, cut Microsoft some slack. They're doin
    g the best they can.

    Paul
    http://greyhatsecurity.org

  2. #2
    Jay D. Dyson
    Re: Office 10 applications &amp; flashdrives can be used to browse
    Gast
    n/a Berichten
    Berichten zijn liked



    Thread Starter

    Re: Office 10 applications & flashdrives can be used to browse

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA1

    On Fri, 25 Feb 2005, Paul wrote:

    > Seriously, people, cut Microsoft some slack. They're doing the best they
    > can.


    Considering that Microsoft is a multi-billion dollar corporation,
    I cannot agree that it deserves any slack. If Microsoft can afford to
    sell software that leaves its customers at risk, it can afford to issue
    hotfixes to remedy the problems that it created. And I don't buy into the
    "get the Service Pack" argument after having dealt with the ridiculously
    FUBAR'd mess called SP2 for XP that went down last year.

    Bottom line: Microsoft customers are paying gourmet prices for
    Redmond's products and are getting McDonald's quality for security.

    - -Jay

    ( ( _______
    )) )) .-"There's always time for a good cup of coffee"-. >====<--.
    C|~~|C|~~| (>----- Jay D. Dyson -- jdyson@treachery.net -----<) | = |-'
    `--' `--' `-I just started World War III. You're welcome.-' `------'

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
    Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (TreacherOS)
    Comment: See http://www.treachery.net/~jdyson/ for current keys.

    iD8DBQFCILLlBYoRACwSF0cRAmorAJwNfCme2RBnV6rrqGqTjH MH/2friwCeMZjH
    OtuTdoBHOvXjZSg0kSOfHKE=
    =ENFp
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

  3. #3
    Jay D. Dyson
    Re: Office 10 applications &amp; flashdrives can be used to browse
    Gast
    n/a Berichten
    Berichten zijn liked



    Thread Starter

    Re: Office 10 applications & flashdrives can be used to browse

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA1

    On Sat, 26 Feb 2005, Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP] wrote:

    > Go back and read the original post.


    Why? I'm not even replying to the original post. I couldn't give
    a good rip about the original post.

    > "VENDOR RESPONSE


    First mistake. I take every vendor response with a grain of salt
    since it's always run through their PR department and their corporate
    lawyers before we ever get treated to the watered-down (and usually
    fact-free) missive that they design to toss at us like so many table
    scraps. Those of us who have been around long enough will starkly recall
    the "vendor response" that Ford Motor Company had when its Pintos
    developed a penchant for exploding when rear-ended. Nufsed.

    > Whether or not you want to cut Microsoft some slack... there's a process
    > of ethical and responsible disclosure that I would expect Sonny as a
    > representative of a governmental agency would understand. He not only
    > put his own government computers at risk but others in this disclosure,
    > yes?


    In my book, Microsoft is the entity that put those systems at risk
    with their shoddy malware. Sonny only showed that the flaw existed. I'll
    leave it to the philosophy majors to debate the ethics of the issue.
    Personally, I believe in full disclosure. And considering that Microsoft
    has (for want of a better expression) money coming out of its butt, I
    should think they'd be able to spend that money in a fashion that would
    put security first...and quick.

    And I'm glad your SP2 implementation went well. I had to deal
    with VPNs when SP2 rolled out. If you'd had to, your outlook on that
    service pack would be decidely less than cheery.

    - -Jay

    ( ( _______
    )) )) .-"There's always time for a good cup of coffee"-. >====<--.
    C|~~|C|~~| (>----- Jay D. Dyson -- jdyson@treachery.net -----<) | = |-'
    `--' `--' `-I just started World War III. You're welcome.-' `------'

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
    Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (TreacherOS)
    Comment: See http://www.treachery.net/~jdyson/ for current keys.

    iD8DBQFCIOr5BYoRACwSF0cRAhtNAJ0VuDDs2yPVS722o67lIs/JgEyX9wCeIfi9
    uJ/xN56JliAYBfIrVorn2P4=
    =Mg87
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Webhostingtalk.nl

Contact

  • Rokin 113-115
  • 1012 KP, Amsterdam
  • Nederland
  • Contact
© Copyright 2001-2026 Webhostingtalk.nl.
Web Statistics