Likes Likes:  0
Resultaten 1 tot 2 van de 2
Geen
  1. #1
    Jonathan G. Lampe
    stick with "anonymous" or "authenticated" when describing
    Gast
    n/a Berichten
    Berichten zijn liked



    Thread Starter

    stick with "anonymous" or "authenticated" when describing

    At 11:27 AM 12/22/2004, Adam Shostack wrote:
    >I've long advocated 'credentialed' to refer to attacks where a user of
    >the system can execute the attack, and 'anonymous' or
    >'non-credentialed' to refer to refer to attacks on servers, such as
    >httpd, ftpd, or named.


    The word "authenticated" already has the meaning of what I think you were
    trying to express with "credentialed"; "authenticated" means that a user
    has already presented credentials of some kind (username, password, PIN,
    key, cert, token, etc.), that those credentials were accepted and that the
    user enjoyed a different level of privilege than mere "anonymous" users.

    The term "credentialed" suggests that a user has been issued credentials of
    some kind, but that he/she may or may not have used them to authenticate to
    a restricted resource. (The term "credentialed" is similar to the word
    "ticketed".)

    So...I'd stick with "anonymous" or "authenticated" when describing attacks
    on servers.

    -jgl

    ******************* PLEASE NOTE *******************
    This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please del
    ete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.




  2. #2
    Steven M. Christey
    stick with "anonymous" or "authenticated" when describing
    Gast
    n/a Berichten
    Berichten zijn liked



    Thread Starter

    Re: stick with "anonymous" or "authenticated" when describing


    "Jonathan G. Lampe" <jonathan.lampe () standardnetworks ! com> said:

    >So...I'd stick with "anonymous" or "authenticated" [instead of
    >"credentialed"] when describing attacks on servers.


    Based on what I've seen emerging in researcher reports and
    vulnerability databases/notification services, the terms
    "authenticated user" and "unauthenticated attacker" are emerging with
    increasing regularity, especially in "remote" cases (i.e. "remote
    authenticated user" and "remote unauthenticated attacker.") CVE
    descriptions are moving in this direction.

    The "pre-authentication" term is also emerging for cases in which the
    software requires authentication, but the vulnerability appears before
    that authentication has taken place. Obviously not all software uses
    authentication, so this isn't exactly the same thing as
    "unauthenticated" attacks.

    - Steve

Webhostingtalk.nl

Contact

  • Rokin 113-115
  • 1012 KP, Amsterdam
  • Nederland
  • Contact
© Copyright 2001-2026 Webhostingtalk.nl.
Web Statistics