Likes Likes:  0
Resultaten 1 tot 2 van de 2
Geen
  1. #1
    Incorrect reporting of the Bofra/The Register exploit
    Gast
    n/a Berichten
    Berichten zijn liked



    Thread Starter

    Incorrect reporting of the Bofra/The Register exploit



    Hi All,

    In response to several regardings the spreading of the Bofra virus, it is not correct. It was not the work of a virus but a carefully planned hack. The Register just happened to be the site I first noticed the activity on and performed my analysis. I cont
    acted Falk eSolutions AG by telephone to explain to them what was going on. The person I spoke to who clueless about the situation but said he would forward on a message to their support team. After an hour the attack had not stopped so I phoned again. I
    explained the situation again and he gave me an address to contact their support team on. I sent them a report of how their site was sending Internet Explorer users to the infected search.comedycentral.com site and also sent the same report to The Registe
    r. It wasn't until a full day later that The Register published their first report. I received a brief e-mail from a Falk AG support engineer based in the U.K. letting me know he'd received my e-mail but that was it. I've hea
    rd nothing from them since nor from The Register.

    I've kept a thread on http://www.finlandforum.org/bb/viewtopic.php?t=7685 documenting what I've found along the way. This is an unpatched exploit and the figures that Falk AG are quoting are incorrect. This attack has been aimed at other sites too so I fe
    el it's much further widespread than is thought.

    Regards,

    Matt

  2. #2
    Florian Laws
    Incorrect reporting of the Bofra/The Register exploit
    Gast
    n/a Berichten
    Berichten zijn liked



    Thread Starter

    Re: Incorrect reporting of the Bofra/The Register exploit

    On Mon, Nov 22, 2004 at 09:02:28PM -0000, matt@welho.com wrote:
    >
    > In response to several regardings the spreading of the Bofra virus,
    > it is not correct. It was not the work of a virus but a carefully
    > planned hack.


    I am surprised nobody seems to care about the load balancer which
    allegedly was compromised to redirect the users to the infected site.

    Your site quotes the load balancer in question to be of "type FLB02/CP",
    but I can find no information of load balancers of the type on the web.

    Do you have some information about this load balancer and the exploit
    used to attack it?

    Regards,

    Florian

Webhostingtalk.nl

Contact

  • Rokin 113-115
  • 1012 KP, Amsterdam
  • Nederland
  • Contact
© Copyright 2001-2026 Webhostingtalk.nl.
Web Statistics