Likes Likes:  0
Resultaten 1 tot 2 van de 2
Geen
  1. #1
    Alan Cox
    CAN-2004-0814: Linux terminal layer races
    Gast
    n/a Berichten
    Berichten zijn liked



    Thread Starter

    CAN-2004-0814: Linux terminal layer races

    Linux 2.6.9 fixes a set of race conditions in the Linux terminal
    subsystem which are believed to go back to 2.2 kernels if not earlier.
    The race shows up problematically in two places.

    Firstly a user can cause crashes and other undefined behaviour by
    issuing a TIOCSETLD ioctl on a terminal interface while another thread
    is performing read or write operations. This was initially reported to
    Linux kernel with a small demonstration application. By careful choice
    of line disciplines it is sometimes possible to access small random
    amounts of kernel data.

    The second case is more problematic in some ways as it is an external
    attack. In this situation an attacker connects to a PPP dialup port on a
    Linux based system and issues the switch from console to ppp then sends
    data at precisely the right moment afterwards so that data arrives
    during the line discipline switch.

    This original locking issue was discovered following up real world
    customer crashes on very highly loaded large port servers. Attempting to
    duplicate it intentionally has been successful over a raw serial link
    but not over a modem. The modems add sufficient randomisation that you
    cannot easily hit the very narrow window. As such it appears that the
    remote attack is not in fact dangerous.

    Jason Baron has also made 2.4.x patches available and posted them to
    linux-kernel. No 2.2 patches currently exist.

    Alan


  2. #2
    Pavel Kankovsky
    CAN-2004-0814: Linux terminal layer races
    Gast
    n/a Berichten
    Berichten zijn liked



    Thread Starter

    Re: CAN-2004-0814: Linux terminal layer races

    On Wed, 20 Oct 2004, Alan Cox wrote:

    > Firstly a user can cause crashes and other undefined behaviour by
    > issuing a TIOCSETLD ioctl on a terminal interface while another thread


    1. Did you mean TIOCSETD?
    2. Sigh. TIOCSETD should have been restricted to root (+) since 1999. (*)

    (*) Since the "user-rawip-attack" vuln reported by Marc Shaefer.
    (+) Perhaps with some workaround to address the problem with processes
    setting the ldisc, dropping the root, and being unable to restore ldisc
    back to N_TTY when they exit.

    --Pavel Kankovsky aka Peak [ Boycott Microsoft--http://www.vcnet.com/bms ]
    "Resistance is futile. Open your source code and prepare for assimilation."


Webhostingtalk.nl

Contact

  • Rokin 113-115
  • 1012 KP, Amsterdam
  • Nederland
  • Contact
© Copyright 2001-2026 Webhostingtalk.nl.
Web Statistics