Likes Likes:  0
Resultaten 1 tot 2 van de 2
Geen
  1. #1
    Gadi Evron
    current leading bots used in drone armies [June/July 2004]
    Gast
    n/a Berichten
    Berichten zijn liked



    Thread Starter

    current leading bots used in drone armies [June/July 2004]

    [For the list of the most used Trojan horses in drone armies for June/July,
    2004, please skip to the end of this email message.]

    I figured a list of this nature once in a while (maybe quarterly or monthly
    depending on the changing threats) can be useful to some administrators who
    wish to actively combat drone armies and/or to inform them as to what they
    can expect, capabilities-wise, when planning the defense of their networks.

    The information is gathered from the relevant professionals in several
    networks who actively follow and combat this threat. In no way do I take any
    credit for it (beyond admitting to writing it down under my name and
    vouching for the details).

    Most of the Trojan horses used for infecting users and creating drone armies
    the past year are sd/phat/rbot variants.

    Sdbots have spawned numerous variants and were separated into new groups of
    malware which in turn were further separated into new groups. Agobots,
    Phatbots, etc.

    Agobots are most likely to reach and move beyond the three letters counting
    (Agobot.ABC).

    It's (kind of) a new world, the world of open-source malware. It's been
    going on for a while, but there are now over a thousand new variants a month
    for different Trojan malware (mostly Trojan horses). The numbers speak for
    themselves. These are not lonely cases, this is "code a virus" opportunity
    for the masses. Usually with tech-support..

    It's always funny to me how some in the AV industry would at times hype new
    worms or new barely different variations of worms, in the media, while
    ignoring drone armies almost completely.

    Just in recent months, due to in many cases me making weird noises, we start
    hearing about drone armies.

    Over-time, a drone army can reach hundreds of thousands of infected drones
    in size, and new armies/drone are created daily. There are a lot more than
    just a few drone armies out there, and the Trojan horses used change
    constantly.

    The basic threat is DDoS from a few thousands of Cable/DSL users (simple
    DDoS, gang blackmail) and it grows all the way to big words such as
    espionage and the fabled hype which may perhaps one day turn true; "the
    death of the Internet". We've had a few close calls (African router, DDoS on
    backbone).

    Usually though, the goal of these drone armies is simple: SPAM.

    Trojan horses used in drone armies and Trojan horses installed on "lonely"
    infected machines far outnumber the amounts of infected users from _most_
    worms.

    The main _spread_ of any worm is usually in the first hours to days of its
    creation and release to "the wild". Worms continue to spread over the
    Internet for years and there are always infected users who have them. Unlike
    worms, most of these Trojan horses remain _overtime_ undisturbed, in huge
    exponentially increasing numbers.

    The (specific) Trojan horses most used as bots in drone armies for
    June/July, 2004, are:

    1. Korgobots:
    Use in drone armies: _everywhere_.

    [For example: Korgobot is a variation of Rbot which in turn was a
    stripped down version of a Phatbot,
    which in turn is a variation of Agobot which in turn is a variation of
    SDbot (KWbot).]

    2. dfgbots:
    Use in drone armies: huge.

    3. Optix Pro.
    Use in drone armies: wide-spread.

    [Important: Optix Pro is an mIRC (IRC client for Windows) script. People
    download this thing from an
    official web site. A checksum for "verification" is available. Cute
    ancient trick. Originally most infections were in Australia.]

    4. Memory bots
    Use in drone armies: wide-spread.

    As an after-thought, I'd like to officially announce the long-awaited end of
    the Girlbots plague. There are still huge Girlbots drone armies out there,
    but the balance is shifting and they are seen far less often.

    You can Google each of these Trojan horses for details. Feel free to contact
    me for help with anything using my home email address.

    Contributions? Corrections? Mistakes? Please email me.

    --
    Gadi Evron,
    Senior Security Consultant
    Central Bureau of Statistics, Israel.
    +972-50-428610 (Cell)
    +972-2-6592257 (Office)
    gadie@cbs.gov.il
    ge@linuxbox.org (Home)

    [If the opinions I express publicly were Israeli government policy, I'd have
    had Shin Bet bodyguards!]

    ************************************************** ************************************************
    ** eSafe (R) scanned this email for viruses, vandals and malicious content **
    ************************************************** ************************************************

  2. #2
    Jan Knutar
    current leading bots used in drone armies [June/July 2004]
    Gast
    n/a Berichten
    Berichten zijn liked



    Thread Starter

    Re: current leading bots used in drone armies [June/July 2004]


    <snip and reordered>
    > Over-time, a drone army can reach hundreds of thousands of infected drones
    > in size, and new armies/drone are created daily. There are a lot more than
    > just a few drone armies out there, and the Trojan horses used change
    > constantly.

    <snip and reorder>
    > Trojan horses used in drone armies and Trojan horses installed on "lonely"
    > infected machines far outnumber the amounts of infected users from _most_
    > worms.

    <snip & reorder>

    > It's always funny to me how some in the AV industry would at times hype new
    > worms or new barely different variations of worms, in the media, while
    > ignoring drone armies almost completely.


    What disturbs me, is the impression I get from the AV industry, of them not caring
    at all about even attempting to detect trojans/drones. At most a checksum based
    check is added if someone reports on particular trojan, which isn't really useful at
    all. From a purely practical point of view, it would seem to me that attaching
    trojan/drone protection to AV software functionality would be the most effective
    way of getting users secured against this, as we all know, trying to educate the
    great masses is nearly impossible at best.

    These vast amount of drone armies have been a problem for some people for years
    now, but it is only now that they start to be used for Spam, instead of the "armies"
    fighting against eachother with some ocasional ISP knocked offline in collateral
    damage for a few hours, that people seem to wake up and realize this is perhaps
    a problem that shouldn't just be categorized and filed away under "Internet ghetto
    activity we do not need to worry about".

    Gadi, I wish you luck in making much more "weird noises"!

Webhostingtalk.nl

Contact

  • Rokin 113-115
  • 1012 KP, Amsterdam
  • Nederland
  • Contact
© Copyright 2001-2026 Webhostingtalk.nl.
Web Statistics