Likes Likes:  0
Resultaten 1 tot 2 van de 2
Geen
  1. #1
    John D. Hardin
    Re: Round One: "DLL Proxy" Attack Easily Hijacks SSL from Internet
    Gast
    n/a Berichten
    Berichten zijn liked



    Thread Starter

    Re: Round One: "DLL Proxy" Attack Easily Hijacks SSL from Internet

    On Tue, 10 Feb 2004, der Mouse wrote:

    > Depends. Does it include the tools necessary to sign my own code?
    >
    > If so, what's to stop a malware creator from using those same tools to
    > sign the attack vector?


    How does the malware author get the private half of a public key you
    trust for software installations?

    --
    John Hardin KA7OHZ ICQ#15735746 http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
    jhardin@impsec.org pgpk -a jhardin@impsec.org
    key: 0xB8732E79 - 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    "Bother," said Pooh as he struggled with /etc/sendmail.cf, "it never
    does quite what I want. I wish Christopher Robin was here."
    -- Peter da Silva in a.s.r
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    53 days until the Slovakian Presidential Election


  2. #2
    der Mouse
    Re: Round One: "DLL Proxy" Attack Easily Hijacks SSL from Internet
    Gast
    n/a Berichten
    Berichten zijn liked



    Thread Starter

    Re: Round One: "DLL Proxy" Attack Easily Hijacks SSL from Internet

    >> Depends. Does it include the tools necessary to sign my own code?

    >> If so, what's to stop a malware creator from using those same tools
    >> to sign the attack vector?


    > How does the malware author get the private half of a public key you
    > trust for software installations?


    The same way you do, of course. Most likely it pops up a box asking
    for it. Given how boneheaded most users seem to be, and given that
    signatures will be needed on most software installs, this will be a
    common sight to many users, and they will probably cheerfully type in
    whatever is necessary to fetch/decrypt it. Look at how effective
    phishing attacks are.

    No, that wouldn't work against me (or, I would hope, you). But I
    wouldn't be running such a thing anyway, and even if I were-- having to
    type a passphrase every time I recompiled something would be
    intolerable, and if it were automated, malware could automate the
    signing just as well as my compiler front-end could.

    /~\ The ASCII der Mouse
    \ / Ribbon Campaign
    X Against HTML mouse@rodents.montreal.qc.ca
    / \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B

Webhostingtalk.nl

Contact

  • Rokin 113-115
  • 1012 KP, Amsterdam
  • Nederland
  • Contact
© Copyright 2001-2026 Webhostingtalk.nl.
Web Statistics