Likes: 0
Has anyone tested these vulnerabilities on NG FP1 or are they strictly
related to FP3?
Eric Hines
-----Original Message-----
From: Dr. Peter Bieringer [mailtobieringer@aerasec.de]
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 6:47 AM
To: Maillist Bugtraq; Maillist full-disclosure
Subject: Check Point FW-1 NG FP3 & FP3 HF1: DoS attack against syslog
daemon possible
Hi all,
interesting for all Check Point FW-1 NG users which have enabled the since
FP3 included syslog daemon.
Alright. I was just concerned because of the wording Checkpoint used on
their web site.
"Prior to the release of NG FP3 HF2......."
I'm going to assume they were referring to the HF2 portion of that, and not
< FP3
Eric Hines
-----Original Message-----
From: dchesterfield@bankofny.com [mailto:dchesterfield@bankofny.com]
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 12:53 PM
To: Hines, Eric
Cc: Maillist Bugtraq; Dr. Peter Bieringer
Subject: Re: Check Point FW-1 NG FP3 & FP3 HF1: DoS attack against
syslog daemon possible
The daemon was apparently only introduced since FP3
"Hines, Eric"
<ehin4@allstate.c To: "Dr. Peter
Bieringer" <pbieringer@aerasec.de>, Maillist Bugtraq
om> <bugtraq@securityfocus.com>
cc:
21/03/2003 06:31 Subject: Re: Check Point
FW-1 NG FP3 & FP3 HF1: DoS attack against syslog daemon
pm possible
Has anyone tested these vulnerabilities on NG FP1 or are they strictly
related to FP3?
Eric Hines
-----Original Message-----
From: Dr. Peter Bieringer [mailto
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 6:47 AM
To: Maillist Bugtraq; Maillist full-disclosure
Subject: Check Point FW-1 NG FP3 & FP3 HF1: DoS attack against syslog
daemon possible
Hi all,
interesting for all Check Point FW-1 NG users which have enabled the
since
FP3 included syslog daemon.
Hi,
accepting syslog messages by a Check Point object has been introduced
with NG FP3, so this effect will not occur with FP1 or FP2.
Best regards,
Matthias
Hines, Eric wrote:
> Has anyone tested these vulnerabilities on NG FP1 or are they strictly
> related to FP3?
>
> Eric Hines
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dr. Peter Bieringer [mailto
> Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 6:47 AM
> To: Maillist Bugtraq; Maillist full-disclosure
> Subject: Check Point FW-1 NG FP3 & FP3 HF1: DoS attack against syslog
> daemon possible
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> interesting for all Check Point FW-1 NG users which have enabled the since
> FP3 included syslog daemon.
>
>
>
--
AERAsec Network Services and Security GmbH
Wagenberger Strasse 1
D-85662 Hohenbrunn, Germany
http://www.aerasec.de
In-Reply-To: <1779CE9992706F45BDC9575124A5AAE50122188A@a0001-xpo0114-s.hodc.ad.allstate.com>
Not exactly cause I have CPK FW-1 NG FP2 Build 52163. The logging server &
management are separated. It seems that syslog is running on port 514udp:
$ ps -aef | grep syslog
root 7239 7231 0 Mar23 ? 00:00:01 syslog 514 all
Maybe the wording Checkpoint used on their web site.
"Prior to the release of NG FP3 HF2......." really does include ALL
releases before FP3
Rizan
>Received: (qmail 16221 invoked from network); 21 Mar 2003 23:10:48 -0000
>Received: from outgoing2.securityfocus.com (HELO
outgoing.securityfocus.com) (205.206.231.26)
> by mail.securityfocus.com with SMTP; 21 Mar 2003 23:10:48 -0000
>Received: from lists.securityfocus.com (lists.securityfocus.com
[205.206.231.19])
> by outgoing.securityfocus.com (Postfix) with QMQP
> id 337008F31B; Fri, 21 Mar 2003 16:10:34 -0700 (MST)
>Mailing-List: contact bugtraq-help@securityfocus.com; run by ezmlm
>Precedence: bulk
>List-Id: <bugtraq.list-id.securityfocus.com>
>List-Post: <mailto:bugtraq@securityfocus.com>
>List-Help: <mailto:bugtraq-help@securityfocus.com>
>List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:bugtraq-unsubscribe@securityfocus.com>
>List-Subscribe: <mailto:bugtraq-subscribe@securityfocus.com>
>Delivered-To: mailing list bugtraq@securityfocus.com
>Delivered-To: moderator for bugtraq@securityfocus.com
>Received: (qmail 1533 invoked from network); 21 Mar 2003 18:47:50 -0000
>Message-ID: <1779CE9992706F45BDC9575124A5AAE50122188A@a0001-xpo0114-
s.hodc.ad.allstate.com>
>From: "Hines, Eric" <ehin4@allstate.com>
>To: dchesterfield@bankofny.com
>Subject: RE: Check Point FW-1 NG FP3 & FP3 HF1: DoS attack against syslog
> daemon possible
>Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 12:59:20 -0600
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
>content-class: urn:content-classes:message
>Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset="iso-8859-1"
>
>Alright. I was just concerned because of the wording Checkpoint used on
>their web site.
>"Prior to the release of NG FP3 HF2......."
>
>I'm going to assume they were referring to the HF2 portion of that, and
not
>< FP3
>
>
>Eric Hines
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: dchesterfield@bankofny.com [mailto:dchesterfield@bankofny.com]
>Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 12:53 PM
>To: Hines, Eric
>Cc: Maillist Bugtraq; Dr. Peter Bieringer
>Subject: Re: Check Point FW-1 NG FP3 & FP3 HF1: DoS attack against
>syslog daemon possible
>
>
>
>The daemon was apparently only introduced since FP3
>
>
>
>
>
> "Hines, Eric"
>
> <ehin4@allstate.c To: "Dr. Peter
>Bieringer" <pbieringer@aerasec.de>, Maillist Bugtraq
> om>
<bugtraq@securityfocus.com>
>
> cc:
>
> 21/03/2003 06:31 Subject: Re: Check Point
>FW-1 NG FP3 & FP3 HF1: DoS attack against syslog daemon
> pm possible
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Has anyone tested these vulnerabilities on NG FP1 or are they strictly
>related to FP3?
>
>Eric Hines
>
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Dr. Peter Bieringer [mailto
>Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 6:47 AM
>To: Maillist Bugtraq; Maillist full-disclosure
>Subject: Check Point FW-1 NG FP3 & FP3 HF1: DoS attack against syslog
>daemon possible
>
>
>Hi all,
>
>interesting for all Check Point FW-1 NG users which have enabled the
>since
>FP3 included syslog daemon.
>
>
>
>
>
Quote