Bill Nash schrieb:
....
> *ANY* language implemented for *ANY* purpose is as secure as the
> programmer makes it. The way the original post is written,
> s/PHP/(Perl|ASP|C|bash|BASIC|four little buddhist monks fighting over an
> abacus)/ is applicable. The vulnerabilities that we see, that Gadi refers
> to, aren't widespread because PHP is widespread, but because insecure
> applications written in PHP are. A better use of energy would be
> focusing on the most vulnerable platforms and educating the developers.

But aparently they aren't educatable - hence they stick to this
language. (Because of the many bad examples they can cut&paste
code from)

T.