Casper.Dik@Sun.COM
26/03/06, 00:00
>So you are basically saying open source free software can't be trusted to
>hold high standards or be reliable or secure if I don't pay for it?
No, he is saying that *their* high standards are not necesarily *your*
high standards. And that *they* get to define the rules with which they
publish their advisories; many people are fine with the way they do
it so why should they listen to *you*?
Casper
>hold high standards or be reliable or secure if I don't pay for it?
No, he is saying that *their* high standards are not necesarily *your*
high standards. And that *they* get to define the rules with which they
publish their advisories; many people are fine with the way they do
it so why should they listen to *you*?
Casper