Stan Bubrouski
04/02/06, 00:00
So this isn't actually remotely exploitable at all since its within a
dialog box that a local user must manually fill in?
Best Regards,
sb
On 3 Feb 2006 02:28:56 -0000, shell@dotshell.net <shell@dotshell.net> wrote=
:
> As I submitted to full disclosure:
>
> "I have discovered that there is a buffer overrun vulnerability in AOL's =
Instant Messenger program. I have only tested this on version 5.9.3861. The=
problem causes a minimum of a program crash. I am not sure as to the posib=
ility of shellcode execution.
>
> The vulnerability can be exploited by supplying an overly large username =
from which to obtain "buddy info."
>
> If you are unsure as to what I am talking about, I can post a screenshot.=
"
>
> Well, I made a Macromedia Captivate-made video of it. http://www.dotshell=
..net/aim.swf. What I am thinking is that a program can be written to write =
an overlong string and shellcode to the address effected and execute the sa=
me operation to leverage the problem.
>
dialog box that a local user must manually fill in?
Best Regards,
sb
On 3 Feb 2006 02:28:56 -0000, shell@dotshell.net <shell@dotshell.net> wrote=
:
> As I submitted to full disclosure:
>
> "I have discovered that there is a buffer overrun vulnerability in AOL's =
Instant Messenger program. I have only tested this on version 5.9.3861. The=
problem causes a minimum of a program crash. I am not sure as to the posib=
ility of shellcode execution.
>
> The vulnerability can be exploited by supplying an overly large username =
from which to obtain "buddy info."
>
> If you are unsure as to what I am talking about, I can post a screenshot.=
"
>
> Well, I made a Macromedia Captivate-made video of it. http://www.dotshell=
..net/aim.swf. What I am thinking is that a program can be written to write =
an overlong string and shellcode to the address effected and execute the sa=
me operation to leverage the problem.
>