Alireza Hassani
26/12/07, 20:45
--- shsuff@hotmail.com wrote:
> Nothing new.
> Already found: http://securityreason.com/achievement_securityalert/36/
I think it’s obvious that this one focuses on safe_mode restriction weakness and that one talks
about open_basedir! The only Similarity between these two advisories is the vulnerable tempnam
function
>
> And this will not bypass safe_mode but open_basedir ...
>
Which one do you talk about , this or that?
__________________________________________________ __________________________________
Looking for last minute shopping deals?
Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping
> Nothing new.
> Already found: http://securityreason.com/achievement_securityalert/36/
I think it’s obvious that this one focuses on safe_mode restriction weakness and that one talks
about open_basedir! The only Similarity between these two advisories is the vulnerable tempnam
function
>
> And this will not bypass safe_mode but open_basedir ...
>
Which one do you talk about , this or that?
__________________________________________________ __________________________________
Looking for last minute shopping deals?
Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping