Robert Swiecki
07/08/07, 22:29
paraw wrote:
>> The first example uses setInterval() call with relatively small interval
>> value (e.g. 0) to change window.location property. A browser is
>> entrapped within the attacking web site while the user thinks that
>> browser actually left the page.
>> http://alt.swiecki.net/konq2.html
>> [...]
>
> Didn't really work on my computer. The content of the address bar could be seen changing
> continuously between swiecki.net and google.com, probably in a way similar to what happens with Safari.
I tested this one with Konqueror 3.5.5 (on Debian Etch) and it worked
for me. Can anyone confirm or deny this?
>> Tested with Konqueror 3.5.7 on Linux 2.6
>
> Again, it didn't work. My address bar showed "%20@alt.swiecki.net/saft2.html", aligned to the right.
I suppose this behaviour is related to this patch
http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2007-July/064654.html
It seems to me that only patched konquerors are vulnerable :)
--
Robert Swiecki
>> The first example uses setInterval() call with relatively small interval
>> value (e.g. 0) to change window.location property. A browser is
>> entrapped within the attacking web site while the user thinks that
>> browser actually left the page.
>> http://alt.swiecki.net/konq2.html
>> [...]
>
> Didn't really work on my computer. The content of the address bar could be seen changing
> continuously between swiecki.net and google.com, probably in a way similar to what happens with Safari.
I tested this one with Konqueror 3.5.5 (on Debian Etch) and it worked
for me. Can anyone confirm or deny this?
>> Tested with Konqueror 3.5.7 on Linux 2.6
>
> Again, it didn't work. My address bar showed "%20@alt.swiecki.net/saft2.html", aligned to the right.
I suppose this behaviour is related to this patch
http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2007-July/064654.html
It seems to me that only patched konquerors are vulnerable :)
--
Robert Swiecki