HACKPL - bugtraq/sapheal
18/01/07, 00:12
> So it could be remotely
> exploitable after all.
>
> On the other hand, most people don't tell their browsers to open up a
> separate application to handle ftp:// links.
I agree. It could be exploited in the aforementioned way(but: WS_FTP is not
registered to handle FTP protocol by default). Now I am thinking of
something else. Could we use a specially crafted FHF file to exploit the
vulnerability? I haven't checked that yet.
Michal Bucko (sapheal)
> exploitable after all.
>
> On the other hand, most people don't tell their browsers to open up a
> separate application to handle ftp:// links.
I agree. It could be exploited in the aforementioned way(but: WS_FTP is not
registered to handle FTP protocol by default). Now I am thinking of
something else. Could we use a specially crafted FHF file to exploit the
vulnerability? I haven't checked that yet.
Michal Bucko (sapheal)